Circular Reasoning
Spot the Fallacy Team
Team Content
Circular reasoning uses the conclusion as one of its premises, providing no independent support.
Circular reasoning uses the conclusion as one of its premises, providing no independent support.
Why it is a fallacy
A claim needs evidence that connects the reasons to the conclusion. This fallacy skips that connection or replaces it with a shortcut.
Examples
- This law is just because it is the law.
- The product works because it is effective.
- I am trustworthy because I always tell the truth.
How to respond
- Ask for evidence that does not restate the conclusion.
- Point out where the argument repeats itself.
- Request an independent premise.
Related fallacies
FAQ
What is a quick test for circular reasoning?
If the premise and conclusion say the same thing, it's circular.
Is circular reasoning always obvious?
No. It can be hidden with rewording or vague terms.
References
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fallacies)
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Logic and Critical Thinking)
- Nizkor Project (Fallacies)