Correlation vs Causation Fallacy
Spot the Fallacy Team
Team Content
Correlation versus causation fallacy assumes that because two things move together, one causes the other.
Correlation versus causation fallacy assumes that because two things move together, one causes the other.
Why it is a fallacy
A claim needs evidence that connects the reasons to the conclusion. This fallacy skips that connection or replaces it with a shortcut.
Examples
- Ice cream sales rise with drownings, so ice cream causes drownings.
- People who exercise live longer, so exercise is the only cause of longevity.
- The stock rose after the tweet, so the tweet caused the rise.
How to respond
- Ask whether there is a plausible mechanism linking the two.
- Consider whether a third variable explains both.
- Look for controlled studies or experiments.
Related fallacies
FAQ
How is this different from false cause?
It is a common form of false cause focused on correlation.
What helps establish causation?
Mechanisms, controls, and repeated evidence across contexts.
References
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fallacies)
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Logic and Critical Thinking)
- Nizkor Project (Fallacies)
